Private Practice Revises Policies and Procedures Addressing Activities Preparatory to Research
Private Practice Revises Policies and Procedures Addressing Activities Preparatory to Research
Covered Entity: Private Practice
Issue: Impermissible Disclosure-Research
A private practice physician who was the principal investigator of a
clinical research study disclosed a list of patients and diagnostic
codes to a contract research organization to telephone patients for
recruitment purposes. The disclosure was not consistent with documents
approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The private practice
maintained that the disclosure to the contract research organization was
permissible as a review preparatory to research. Activities considered
“preparatory to research” include: preparing a research protocol;
developing a research hypothesis; and identifying prospective research
participants. Contacting individuals to participate in a research study
is a use or disclosure of protected health information (PHI) for
recruitment, as it is part of the research and is not an activity
preparatory to research. To remedy this situation, the private practice
revised its policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of PHI and
trained all physicians and staff members on the new policies and
procedures. Under the revised policies and procedures, the practice may
use and disclose PHI for research purposes, including recruitment, only
if a valid authorization is obtained from each individual or if the
covered entity obtains documentation that an alteration to or a waiver
of the authorization requirement has been approved by an IRB or a
Privacy Board.
| Hospital Implements New Minimum Necessary Polices for Telephone Messages Covered Entity: General Hospital Issue: Minimum Necessary; Confidential Communications A hospital employee did not observe minimum necessary requirements when she left a telephone message with the daughter of a patient that detailed both her medical condition and treatment plan. An OCR investigation also indicated that the confidential communications requirements were not followed, as the employee left the message at the patient’s home telephone number, despite the patient’s instructions to contact her through her work number. To resolve the issues in this case, the hospital developed and implemented several new procedures. ...read more |
| When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials? Answer: The Privacy Rule is balanced to protect an individual’s privacy while allowing important law enforcement functions to continue. The Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information (PHI) to law enforcement officials, without the individual’s written authorization, under specific circumstances summarized below. For a complete understanding of the conditions and requirements for these disclosures, please review the exact regulatory text at the citations provided. Disclosures for law enforcement purposes are permitted as follows: To comply with a court order or ...read more |
| May a covered entity dispose of protected health information in dumpsters accessible by the public? For example, depending on the circumstances, proper disposal methods may include (but are not limited to): Shredding or otherwise destroying PHI in paper records so that the PHI is rendered essentially unreadable, indecipherable, and otherwise cannot be reconstructed prior to it being placed in a dumpster or other trash receptacle.Maintaining PHI for disposal in a secure area and using a disposal vendor as a business associate to pick up and shred or otherwise destroy the PHI.In justifiable cases, based on the size and the ...read more |
| Pharmacy Chain Enters into Business Associate Agreement with Law Firm Covered Entity: Pharmacy Chain Issue: Impermissible Uses and Disclosures; Business Associates A complaint alleged that a law firm working on behalf of a pharmacy chain in an administrative proceeding impermissibly disclosed the PHI of a customer of the pharmacy chain. OCR investigated the allegation and found no evidence that the law firm had impermissibly disclosed the customer’s PHI. However, the investigation revealed that the pharmacy chain and the law firm had not entered into a Business Associate Agreement, as required by the Privacy Rule to ensure that PHI is ...read more |
|
December 2024
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
11/12/22 Modernizing Medicine Agrees to Pay $45 Million to Resolve Allegations of Accepting and Paying Illegal Kickbacks and Causing False Claims
11/12/22 Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
11/12/22 Former Hospital Employee Pleads Guilty To Criminal HIPPA Charges
11/12/22 Covered entities and those persons rendered accountable by general principles of corporate criminal liability may be prosecuted directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6
11/12/22 The Delaware Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Data Breach
11/12/22 OCR Settles Three Cases with Dental Practices for Patient Right of Access under HIPAA
11/12/22 HHS Issues Guidance on HIPAA and Audio-Only Telehealth
11/12/22 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations
11/12/22 May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
11/12/22 When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
11/12/22 Must a covered entity inform individuals in advance of any fees that may be charged when the individuals request a copy of their PHI?
Blog Archives
November 2022 (54)
Blog Labels
HIPAA (2)
Telehealth (1)
HIPAA Enforcement (3)
PPP Fraud (1)
Data Breach (1)
ePHI (2)
BAA (3)
Covered Entity (40)
EHR Fraud (1)
|
