Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
Wednesday, November 9, 2022 A
federal grand jury in Newark, New Jersey, returned an indictment today
charging an Indian national for fraudulently obtaining millions of
dollars in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans guaranteed by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief,
and Economic Security (CARES) Act.
According to court documents, Abhishek Krishnan, 40, previously
resided in Wake County, North Carolina, before returning to his home
country of India. After returning to India, Krishnan allegedly submitted
numerous fraudulent PPP loan applications to federally insured banks,
including on behalf of purported companies that were not registered
business entities. The fraudulent PPP loan applications allegedly
included false statements about the companies’ employees and payroll
expenses, as well as falsified tax filings. As part of the fraud scheme,
Krishnan allegedly used the name of another person without that
person’s authority. Krishnan allegedly submitted at least 17 PPP loan
applications seeking over $8.2 million and received more than $3.3
million in loan proceeds. Following receipt of the funds, Krishnan
allegedly laundered the proceeds of the fraud.
Krishnan is charged with two counts of wire fraud, two counts of
money laundering, and two counts of aggravated identify theft. If
convicted, Krishnan faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison on
each of the top counts and a mandatory minimum of two years in prison on
each count of aggravated identify theft. A federal district court judge
will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the Justice
Department’s Criminal Division; U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger for
the District of New Jersey; Special Agent in Charge Mark Morini of the
U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA),
Southeast Field Division; Special Agent in Charge Kyle A. Myles of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General
(FDIC-OIG), Atlanta Region; U.S. Marshal Michael East for the Eastern
District of North Carolina; and Special Agent in Charge Amaleka
McCall-Brathwaite of the Small Business Administration Office of
Inspector General (SBA-OIG), Eastern Region made the announcement.
The TIGTA, FDIC-OIG, U.S. Marshals Service, and SBA-OIG are investigating the case.
Assistant Chief Justin Woodard and Trial Attorney Thomas D. Campbell
of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney
Katherine M. Romano for the District of New Jersey are prosecuting the
case, with assistance from Assistant U.S. Attorney Susan B. Menzer for
the Eastern District of North Carolina.
In a separate case, Krishnan was recently charged
in the Eastern District of North Carolina with theft of government
property and aggravated identity theft regarding his alleged receipt of
unemployment insurance benefits funded by the federal government in
response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Fraud Section leads the Criminal Division’s prosecution of fraud
schemes that exploit the PPP. Since the inception of the CARES Act, the
Fraud Section has prosecuted over 150 defendants in more than 95
criminal cases and has seized over $75 million in cash proceeds derived
from fraudulently obtained PPP funds, as well as numerous real estate
properties and luxury items purchased with such proceeds. More
information can be found at https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/ppp-fraud.
On May 17, 2021, the Attorney General established the COVID-19 Fraud
Enforcement Task Force to marshal the resources of the Department of
Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance
efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force
bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic
and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with
administering relief programs to prevent fraud by augmenting and
incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources
and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and
sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior
enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response
to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.
Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud
involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s
National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web
Complaint Form at https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.
| § 164.314 Organizational requirements. (a) (1) Standard: Business associate contracts or other arrangements. The contract or other arrangement required by § 164.308(b)(3) must meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), or (a)(2)(iii) of this section, as applicable. (2) Implementation specifications (Required) - (i) Business associate contracts. The contract must provide that the business associate will - (A) Comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart; (B) In accordance with § 164.308(b)(2), ensure that any subcontractors that create, receive, maintain, or transmit electronic protected health information on behalf of the business associate agree to comply with the applicable requirements of ...read more |
| HMO Revises Process to Obtain Valid Authorizations Covered Entity: Health Plans / HMOs Issue: Impermissible Uses and Disclosures; Authorizations A complaint alleged that an HMO impermissibly disclosed a member’s PHI, when it sent her entire medical record to a disability insurance company without her authorization. An OCR investigation indicated that the form the HMO relied on to make the disclosure was not a valid authorization under the Privacy Rule. Among other corrective actions to resolve the specific issues in the case, the HMO created a new HIPAA-compliant authorization form and implemented a new policy that directs staff to obtain patient signatures ...read more |
| Hospital Revises Email Distribution as a Result of a Disclosure to Persons Without a "Need to Know" Covered Entity: General Hospital Issue: Impermissible Use and Disclosure A complainant, who was both a patient and an employee of the hospital, alleged that her protected health information (PHI) was impermissibly disclosed to her supervisor. OCR’s investigation revealed that: the hospital distributed an Operating Room (OR) schedule to employees via email; the hospital’s OR schedule contained information about the complainant’s upcoming surgery. While the Privacy Rule may permit the disclosure of an OR schedule containing PHI, in this case, a hospital employee ...read more |
| Pharmacy Chain Revises Process for Disclosures to Law Enforcement Covered Entity: Pharmacies Issue: Impermissible Uses and Disclosures A chain pharmacy disclosed protected health information to municipal law enforcement officials in a manner that did not conform to the provisions of the Privacy Rule. Among other corrective actions to resolve the specific issues in the case, OCR required this chain to revise its national policy regarding law enforcement's access to patient protected health information to comply with the Privacy Rule requirements, including that disclosures of protected health information to law enforcement only be made in response to written requests from ...read more |
|
January 2026
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Understanding Business Associate Agreements
11/12/22 Modernizing Medicine Agrees to Pay $45 Million to Resolve Allegations of Accepting and Paying Illegal Kickbacks and Causing False Claims
11/12/22 Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
11/12/22 Former Hospital Employee Pleads Guilty To Criminal HIPPA Charges
11/12/22 Covered entities and those persons rendered accountable by general principles of corporate criminal liability may be prosecuted directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6
11/12/22 The Delaware Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Data Breach
11/12/22 OCR Settles Three Cases with Dental Practices for Patient Right of Access under HIPAA
11/12/22 HHS Issues Guidance on HIPAA and Audio-Only Telehealth
11/12/22 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations
11/12/22 May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
11/12/22 When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Blog Archives
January 2025 (1)
November 2022 (54)
Blog Labels
ePHI (2)
PPP Fraud (1)
HIPAA (2)
Covered Entity (40)
EHR Fraud (1)
BAA (4)
HIPAA Enforcement (3)
Data Breach (1)
Telehealth (1)
|
